Discuss the limitations found in the study?

Nursing
March 25, 2021
Describe the pathophysiologic progression of the infection into pneumonia and at least two medical/nursing interventions that would be helpful in treating the patient.
March 25, 2021

Discuss the limitations found in the study?

Reading Research Literature
Guidelines and Grading Rubric Week5
Purpose
The student will read research literature to determine the
research purpose, question, design, population, sample, limitations, data
collection and analysis.
Course Outcomes
This
assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
CO
2: Apply research principles to the
interpretation of the content of published research studies. (PO #4 and8)
CO
4: Evaluate published nursing research
for credibility and lab significance related to evidence-based practice. (PO #4
and8)
Points:This
assignment isworth 225
points.
Due Date:Submit to the Reading Research Literature
basket in the Dropbox by11:59 p.m. MT Sundayat the end of Week
5.
Requirements
1.
Download the research articles from
the Chamberlain library.
Retrieve
the following research articles:Make sure you are viewing
the full text PDF. If you view the article in HTML format, you may not be able
to see the tables and figures that are referenced in the questions.
Fu, M., Hu, J., & Cai, X. (2015).
Effectiveness of a community-based diabetes self-management intervention for
Chinese adults with type 2 diabetes: A pilot study. International Journal of
Nursing Practice, 21,132-140. doi:10.1111/ijn.12373
.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswsc&AN=000356970800017&site=eds-live&scope=site”>http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswsc&AN=000356970800017&site=eds-live&scope=site
Pals, R. S., Hansen, U. M., Johansen, C. B., Hansen, C.
S., Jrgensen, M. E., Fleischer, J., & Willaing, I. (2015). Making sense of
a new technology in clinical practice: A qualitative study of patient and
physician perspectives. BMC Health Services Research, 15(1),
1-10. doi:10.1186/s12913-015-1071-1
.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=her&AN=109884152&site=eds-live”>http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=her&AN=109884152&site=eds-live
2.
Download the NR439_Reading_Research_Literature_form.
3.
Watch the video on how to complete
this assignment at.brainshark.com/devry/vu?pi=zGCzbNjK4zHr05z0″>http://www.brainshark.com/devry/vu?pi=zGCzbNjK4zHr05z0.
4.
Type answers to the questions
directly onto the form. Your formdoes NOT need to follow APA formatting;
however, you are expected to use correct grammar, spelling, syntax, and write
in complete sentences.
5.
Save the fileby clicking Save as and
adding your last name, e.g., NR439_W5_Reading_Research_Literature_Form_Smith.docx.
6.
Submit to the Week 5 Reading
Research Literature basket in the Dropbox by11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Week 5.
Please post questions about this paper in the Week 5Q&A Forum.
Grading Criteria
Category
Points
%
Description
Fu, Hu,
& Cai article: Question 1
10
4%
Identifies
the purpose of the research article.
Question
2
10
4%
Identifies
the research question implied in the study.
Question
3
10
4%
Describes
the research design of the study.
Question
4
10
4%
Identifies
and describes the population.
Question
5
10
4%
Was the
sample adequate for the research design
Question
6
10
4%
Describe
the data collection procedure
Question
7
10
4%
How were
the data analyzed
Question
8
10
4%
Describes
the limitations in the study.
Question
9
10
4%
Describes
the authors conclusions.
Question
10
10
5%
How does
this advance knowledge in the field.
Pals et
al article: Question 11
10
5%
Identifies
the purpose of the research article.
Question
12
10
5%
Identifies
the research question implied in the study.
Question
13
10
5%
Describes
the research design of the study.
Question
14
10
5%
Identifies
and describes the population.
Question
15
10
5%
Was the
sample adequate for the research design
Question
16
10
5%
Describe
the data collection procedure
Question
17
10
5%
How were
the data analyzed
Question
18
10
5%
Describes
the limitations in the study.
Question
19
10
5%
Describes
the authors conclusions.
Question
20
10
5%
How does
this advance knowledge in the field.
Style
and Writing
25
11%
Names
file, includes name on paper. Writes in complete sentences with no grammar,
spelling, or syntax errors.
Total
225 pts
100%
A quality
assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements
Grading Rubric
Assignment Criteria
A (100%)
Exceptional
Outstanding or highest level of performance
B (88%)
Exceeds
Very good or high level of performance
C (80%)
Meets
Competent or satisfactory level of performance
NI (38%)
Needs Improvement
Poor or failing level of performance
F (0%)
Developing
Unsatisfactory level of performance
Fu, Hu, & Cai article:
Question 1 Purpose
10 points
Correctly identifies the purpose of the research
article.
10 points ?
Mostly identifies the purpose of the research
article
9 points ?
Somewhat identifies the purpose of the research
article.
8 points ?
Offers a purpose for the article, but incorrectly
identifies it.
4 points ?
Does not identify any purpose for the research.
0 points ?
Question 2 Research question
10 points
Correctly identifies the research questionin the study, or identifies the
implied question, or indicates that no research question was given.
10 points ?
Mostly identifies the research question that the
author described.
9 points ?
Somewhat identifies the research question that
the author described.
8 points ?
Offers a research question, but incorrectly
identifies it.
4 points ?
Does not identify any research question.
0 points ?
Question 3
Research design
10 points
Correctly describes the research design of the
study.
10 points ?
Mostly describes the research design of the
study.
9 points ?
Somewhat describes the research design of the
study.
8 points ?
Offers a research design, but incorrectly
identifies it.
4 points ?
Does not identify any research design.
0 points ?
Question 4 Population
10 points
Correctly identifies and
describes in detail the population of the research article.
10 points ?
Mostly describesidentifies and describes the population of the
research article.
9 points ?
Somewhatidentifies and describes the population of the
research article.
8 points ?
Offers a population, but incorrectly identifies
it as the one in the research article.
4 points ?
Does notidentify any population.
0 points ?
Question 5 Sample
10 points
Correctly explains if the sampling approach was
appropriate for the research design studied, and if it was adequate.
10 points ?
Correctly explains if the sampling approach was
appropriate for the research design studied, but fails to correctly identify
if it was adequate.
9 points ?
Correctly explains the sampling approach, but
incorrectly identifies if it was, or was not, appropriate or adequate.
8 points ?
Misidentifies the sampling approach.
4 points ?
Doesnt explain any sampling approach.
0 points ?
Question 6 Data collection
10 points
Correctly describes the data collection procedure
in detail.
10 points ?
Correctly describes the data collection procedure
in general.
9 points ?
Correctly describes most of the data collection
procedure but fails to describe all of it.
8 points ?
Incorrectly describes the data collection
procedure, or omits most of the information.
4 points ?
Does not describe any data collection procedures.
0 points ?
Question 7 Data analysis
10 points
Correctly describes how
the all of the data were analyzed.
10 points ?
Correctly describes how
most of the data were analyzed.
9 points ?
Describes how the data
were analyzed, but may contain some misinformation.
8 points ?
Describes incorrectly how data were analyzed, or
omitted large portions of the information.
4 points ?
Does not describe how
data were analyzed.
0 points ?
Question 8 Limitations
10 points
Correctlydescribes all of the limitations in the study.
10 points ?
Correctlydescribes most of the limitations in the study.
9 points ?
Correctly describes some of the limitations in
the study, but may omit one or two.
8 points ?
Minimally describes the limitations of the study,
or misidentifies them.
4 points ?
Does not describe any
limitations for the study.
0 points ?
Question 9 Conclusions
10 points
Correctly describes all of the authors
conclusions.
10 points ?
Correctly describes most of the authors
conclusions.
9 points ?
Correctly describes some of the authors
conclusions, but may
omit one or two.
8 points ?
Minimally describes the authors conclusions, or
misidentifies them.
4 points ?
Does not describe any author conclusions.
0 points ?
Question 10 Advances knowledge
10 points
Describes in-depth how this research advances
knowledge in the field.
10 points ?
Generally, describes how this research advances
knowledge
9 points ?
Briefly describes how this research advances
knowledge in the field.
8 points ?
Incorrectlydescribes how this research advances knowledge in
the field.
4 points ?
Does not describe how the research advances
knowledge in the field.
0 points ?
Pals et al article:
Question 11 Purpose
10 points
Correctly identifies the purpose of the research
article.
10 points ?
Mostly identifies the purpose of the research
article
9 points ?
Somewhat identifies the purpose of the research
article.
8 points ?
Offers a purpose for the article, but incorrectly
identifies it.
4 points ?
Does not identify any purpose for the research.
0 points ?
Question 12 Research question
10 points
Correctly identifies the research questionin the study, or identifies the
implied question, or indicates that no research question was given.
10 points ?
Mostly identifies the research question that the
author described.
9 points ?
Somewhat identifies the research question that
the author described.
8 points ?
Offers a research question, but incorrectly
identifies it.
4 points ?
Does not identify any research question.
0 points ?
Question 13
Research design
10 points
Correctly describes the research design of the
study.
10 points ?
Mostly describes the research design of the
study.
9 points ?
Somewhat describes the research design of the
study.
8 points ?
Offers a research design, but incorrectly
identifies it.
4 points ?
Does not identify any research design.
0 points ?
Question 14 Population
10 points
Correctly identifies and
describes in detail the population of the research article.
10 points ?
Mostly describesidentifies and describes the population of the
research article.
9 points ?
Somewhatidentifies and describes the population of the
research article.
8 points ?
Offers a population, but incorrectly identifies
it as the one in the research article.
4 points ?
Does notidentify any population.
0 points ?
Question 15 Sample
10 points
Correctly explains if the sampling approach was
appropriate for the research design studied, and if it was adequate.
10 points ?
Correctly explains if the sampling approach was
appropriate for the research design studied, but fails to correctly identify
if it was adequate.
9 points ?
Correctly explains the sampling approach, but
incorrectly identifies if it was, or was not, appropriate or adequate.
8 points ?
Misidentifies the sampling approach.
4 points ?
Doesnt explain any sampling approach.
0 points ?
Question 16 Data collection
10 points
Correctly describes the data collection procedure
in detail.
10 points ?
Correctly describes the data collection procedure
in general.
9 points ?
Correctly describes most of the data collection
procedure but fails to describe all of it.
8 points ?
Incorrectly describes the data collection
procedure, or omits most of the information.
4 points ?
Does not describe any data collection procedures.
0 points ?
Question 17 Data analysis
10 points
Correctly describes how
the all of the data were analyzed.
10 points ?
Correctly describes how
most of the data were analyzed.
9 points ?
Describes how the data
were analyzed, but may contain some misinformation.
8 points ?
Describes incorrectly how data were analyzed, or
omitted large portions of the information.
4 points ?
Does not describe how
data were analyzed.
0 points ?
Question 18 Limitations
10 points
Correctlydescribes all of the limitations in the study.
10 points ?
Correctlydescribes most of the limitations in the study.
9 points ?
Correctly describes some of the limitations in
the study, but may omit one or two.
8 points ?
Minimally describes the limitations of the study,
or misidentifies them.
4 points ?
Does not describe any
limitations for the study.
0 points ?
Question 19 Conclusions
10 points
Correctly describes all of the authors
conclusions.
10 points ?
Correctly describes most of the authors
conclusions.
9 points ?
Correctly describes some of the authors
conclusions, but may
omit one or two.
8 points ?
Minimally describes the authors conclusions, or
misidentifies them.
4 points ?
Does not describe any author conclusions.
0 points ?
Question 20 Advances knowledge
10 points
Describes in-depth how this research advances
knowledge in the field.
10 points ?
Generally, describes how this research advances
knowledge
9 points ?
Briefly describes how this research advances
knowledge in the field.
8 points ?
Incorrectlydescribes how this research advances knowledge in
the field.
4 points ?
Does not describe how the research advances
knowledge in the field.
0 points ?
Style and Writing
25 points
Correctly names file, includes name on paper. Writes
in complete sentences with no grammar, spelling, or syntax errors.
25 points ?
One to four errors in grammar, spelling,
22 points ?
Five to eight errors in grammar, spelling, and
syntax
20 points ?
Eight to twelve errors in grammar, spelling, and
syntax.
10 points ?
Thirteen or more errors in grammar, spelling, and
syntax.
0 points ?
Total
Points Possible = 225 points
Reading Research Literature Week 5
Type your answers to the following
questions using complete sentences and correct grammar, spelling, and syntax. Click
Save as and save the file with your last name and assignment, e.g.,NR439_Reading_Research_Literature_Smith.Submit
to the Dropbox by11:59 pm MT Sunday at the end of Week
5. The
guidelines and grading rubric for this assignment may be
found in Course Resources.
Title: RRL
Name:[replace this text with your name] The following questions pertain to:
Fu, M., Hu, J., & Cai, X. (2015).
Effectiveness of a community-based diabetes self-management intervention for
Chinese adults with type 2 diabetes: A pilot study. International Journal of
Nursing Practice, 21132-140 9p. doi:10.1111/ijn.12373
.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=109809079&site=eds-live”>http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=109809079&site=eds-live
1) What is the purpose of this research?
2) What is the research question (or
questions)? This may be implicit or explicit.
3) Give a complete description of theresearch
design of this study.
4) Describe the population (sample) for
this study.
5)
Was
the sample adequate for the research design that was selected and explain why.
6)
Describe
the data collection procedure.
7)
How
were the data analyzed after collection?
8)
Discuss
the limitations found in the study.
9)
Discuss
the authors’ conclusions. Do you feel these conclusions are based on the data
that they collected?
10) How does this advance knowledge in the field?
The
following questions pertain to:
Pals, R. S., Hansen, U. M., Johansen,
C. B., Hansen, C. S., Jrgensen, M. E., Fleischer, J., & Willaing, I.
(2015). Making sense of a new technology in clinical practice: a qualitative
study of patient and physician perspectives. BMC Health Services Research,
15(1), 1-10. doi:10.1186/s12913-015-1071-1
.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=her&AN=109884152&site=eds-live”>http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=her&AN=109884152&site=eds-live
11) What is the purpose of this research?
12) What is the research question (or
questions)? This may be implicit or explicit.
13) Give a complete description of the
research design of this study.
14) Describe the population (sample) for
this study.
15) Was the sample adequate for the research
design that was selected and explain why.
16) Describe the data collection procedure.
17) How were the data analyzed?
18) Discuss the limitations found in the
study?
19) Discuss the authors’ conclusions. Do
you feel these conclusions are based on the data that they collected?
20) How does this advance knowledge in the field.
Reading Research LiteratureGuidelines and Grading Rubric Week5The student will read research literature to determine the
research purpose, question, design, population, sample, limitations, data
collection and analysis.This
assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:CO
2: Apply research principles to the
interpretation of the content of published research studies. (PO #4 and8)CO
4: Evaluate published nursing research
for credibility and lab significance related to evidence-based practice. (PO #4
and8)Points:This
assignment isworth 225
points.Due Date:Submit to the Reading Research Literature
basket in the Dropbox by11:59 p.m. MT Sundayat the end of Week
5.1.
Download the research articles from
the Chamberlain library.Retrieve
the following research articles:Make sure you are viewing
the full text PDF. If you view the article in HTML format, you may not be able
to see the tables and figures that are referenced in the questions.Fu, M., Hu, J., & Cai, X. (2015).
Effectiveness of a community-based diabetes self-management intervention for
Chinese adults with type 2 diabetes: A pilot study. International Journal of
Nursing Practice, 21,132-140. doi:10.1111/ijn.12373.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswsc&AN=000356970800017&site=eds-live&scope=site”>http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswsc&AN=000356970800017&site=eds-live&scope=sitePals, R. S., Hansen, U. M., Johansen, C. B., Hansen, C.
S., Jrgensen, M. E., Fleischer, J., & Willaing, I. (2015). Making sense of
a new technology in clinical practice: A qualitative study of patient and
physician perspectives. BMC Health Services Research, 15(1),
1-10. doi:10.1186/s12913-015-1071-1.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=her&AN=109884152&site=eds-live”>http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=her&AN=109884152&site=eds-live2.
Download the NR439_Reading_Research_Literature_form.3.
Watch the video on how to complete
this assignment at.brainshark.com/devry/vu?pi=zGCzbNjK4zHr05z0″>http://www.brainshark.com/devry/vu?pi=zGCzbNjK4zHr05z0.4.
Type answers to the questions
directly onto the form. Your formdoes NOT need to follow APA formatting;
however, you are expected to use correct grammar, spelling, syntax, and write
in complete sentences.5.
Save the fileby clicking Save as and
adding your last name, e.g., NR439_W5_Reading_Research_Literature_Form_Smith.docx.6.
Submit to the Week 5 Reading
Research Literature basket in the Dropbox by11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Week 5.
Please post questions about this paper in the Week 5Q&A Forum.Grading CriteriaCategoryPoints%DescriptionFu, Hu,
& Cai article: Question 1104%Identifies
the purpose of the research article.Question
2104%Identifies
the research question implied in the study.Question
3104%Describes
the research design of the study.Question
4104%Identifies
and describes the population.Question
5104%Was the
sample adequate for the research designQuestion
6104%Describe
the data collection procedureQuestion
7104%How were
the data analyzedQuestion
8104%Describes
the limitations in the study.Question
9104%Describes
the authors conclusions.Question
10105%How does
this advance knowledge in the field.Pals et
al article: Question 11105%Identifies
the purpose of the research article.Question
12105%Identifies
the research question implied in the study.Question
13105%Describes
the research design of the study.Question
14105%Identifies
and describes the population.Question
15105%Was the
sample adequate for the research designQuestion
16105%Describe
the data collection procedureQuestion
17105%How were
the data analyzedQuestion
18105%Describes
the limitations in the study.Question
19105%Describes
the authors conclusions.Question
20105%How does
this advance knowledge in the field.Style
and Writing2511%Names
file, includes name on paper. Writes in complete sentences with no grammar,
spelling, or syntax errors.Total225 pts100%A quality
assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirementsAssignment CriteriaA (100%)ExceptionalOutstanding or highest level of performanceB (88%)ExceedsVery good or high level of performanceC (80%)MeetsCompetent or satisfactory level of performanceNI (38%)Needs ImprovementPoor or failing level of performanceF (0%)DevelopingUnsatisfactory level of performanceFu, Hu, & Cai article:Question 1 Purpose10 pointsCorrectly identifies the purpose of the research
article.10 points ?Mostly identifies the purpose of the research
article9 points ?Somewhat identifies the purpose of the research
article.8 points ?Offers a purpose for the article, but incorrectly
identifies it.4 points ?Does not identify any purpose for the research.0 points ?Question 2 Research question10 pointsCorrectly identifies the research questionin the study, or identifies the
implied question, or indicates that no research question was given.10 points ?Mostly identifies the research question that the
author described.9 points ?Somewhat identifies the research question that
the author described.8 points ?Offers a research question, but incorrectly
identifies it.4 points ?Does not identify any research question.0 points ?Question 3Research design10 pointsCorrectly describes the research design of the
study.10 points ?Mostly describes the research design of the
study.9 points ?Somewhat describes the research design of the
study.8 points ?Offers a research design, but incorrectly
identifies it.4 points ?Does not identify any research design.0 points ?Question 4 Population10 pointsCorrectly identifies and
describes in detail the population of the research article.10 points ?Mostly describesidentifies and describes the population of the
research article.9 points ?Somewhatidentifies and describes the population of the
research article.8 points ?Offers a population, but incorrectly identifies
it as the one in the research article.4 points ?Does notidentify any population.0 points ?Question 5 Sample10 pointsCorrectly explains if the sampling approach was
appropriate for the research design studied, and if it was adequate.10 points ?Correctly explains if the sampling approach was
appropriate for the research design studied, but fails to correctly identify
if it was adequate.9 points ?Correctly explains the sampling approach, but
incorrectly identifies if it was, or was not, appropriate or adequate.8 points ?Misidentifies the sampling approach.4 points ?Doesnt explain any sampling approach.0 points ?Question 6 Data collection10 pointsCorrectly describes the data collection procedure
in detail.10 points ?Correctly describes the data collection procedure
in general.9 points ?Correctly describes most of the data collection
procedure but fails to describe all of it.8 points ?Incorrectly describes the data collection
procedure, or omits most of the information.4 points ?Does not describe any data collection procedures.0 points ?Question 7 Data analysis10 pointsCorrectly describes how
the all of the data were analyzed.10 points ?Correctly describes how
most of the data were analyzed.9 points ?Describes how the data
were analyzed, but may contain some misinformation.8 points ?Describes incorrectly how data were analyzed, or
omitted large portions of the information.4 points ?Does not describe how
data were analyzed.0 points ?Question 8 Limitations10 pointsCorrectlydescribes all of the limitations in the study.10 points ?Correctlydescribes most of the limitations in the study.9 points ?Correctly describes some of the limitations in
the study, but may omit one or two.8 points ?Minimally describes the limitations of the study,
or misidentifies them.4 points ?Does not describe any
limitations for the study.0 points ?Question 9 Conclusions10 pointsCorrectly describes all of the authors
conclusions.10 points ?Correctly describes most of the authors
conclusions.9 points ?Correctly describes some of the authors
conclusions, but may
omit one or two.8 points ?Minimally describes the authors conclusions, or
misidentifies them.4 points ?Does not describe any author conclusions.0 points ?Question 10 Advances knowledge10 pointsDescribes in-depth how this research advances
knowledge in the field.10 points ?Generally, describes how this research advances
knowledge9 points ?Briefly describes how this research advances
knowledge in the field.8 points ?Incorrectlydescribes how this research advances knowledge in
the field.4 points ?Does not describe how the research advances
knowledge in the field.0 points ?Pals et al article:Question 11 Purpose10 pointsCorrectly identifies the purpose of the research
article.10 points ?Mostly identifies the purpose of the research
article9 points ?Somewhat identifies the purpose of the research
article.8 points ?Offers a purpose for the article, but incorrectly
identifies it.4 points ?Does not identify any purpose for the research.0 points ?Question 12 Research question10 pointsCorrectly identifies the research questionin the study, or identifies the
implied question, or indicates that no research question was given.10 points ?Mostly identifies the research question that the
author described.9 points ?Somewhat identifies the research question that
the author described.8 points ?Offers a research question, but incorrectly
identifies it.4 points ?Does not identify any research question.0 points ?Question 13Research design10 pointsCorrectly describes the research design of the
study.10 points ?Mostly describes the research design of the
study.9 points ?Somewhat describes the research design of the
study.8 points ?Offers a research design, but incorrectly
identifies it.4 points ?Does not identify any research design.0 points ?Question 14 Population10 pointsCorrectly identifies and
describes in detail the population of the research article.10 points ?Mostly describesidentifies and describes the population of the
research article.9 points ?Somewhatidentifies and describes the population of the
research article.8 points ?Offers a population, but incorrectly identifies
it as the one in the research article.4 points ?Does notidentify any population.0 points ?Question 15 Sample10 pointsCorrectly explains if the sampling approach was
appropriate for the research design studied, and if it was adequate.10 points ?Correctly explains if the sampling approach was
appropriate for the research design studied, but fails to correctly identify
if it was adequate.9 points ?Correctly explains the sampling approach, but
incorrectly identifies if it was, or was not, appropriate or adequate.8 points ?Misidentifies the sampling approach.4 points ?Doesnt explain any sampling approach.0 points ?Question 16 Data collection10 pointsCorrectly describes the data collection procedure
in detail.10 points ?Correctly describes the data collection procedure
in general.9 points ?Correctly describes most of the data collection
procedure but fails to describe all of it.8 points ?Incorrectly describes the data collection
procedure, or omits most of the information.4 points ?Does not describe any data collection procedures.0 points ?Question 17 Data analysis10 pointsCorrectly describes how
the all of the data were analyzed.10 points ?Correctly describes how
most of the data were analyzed.9 points ?Describes how the data
were analyzed, but may contain some misinformation.8 points ?Describes incorrectly how data were analyzed, or
omitted large portions of the information.4 points ?Does not describe how
data were analyzed.0 points ?Question 18 Limitations10 pointsCorrectlydescribes all of the limitations in the study.10 points ?Correctlydescribes most of the limitations in the study.9 points ?Correctly describes some of the limitations in
the study, but may omit one or two.8 points ?Minimally describes the limitations of the study,
or misidentifies them.4 points ?Does not describe any
limitations for the study.0 points ?Question 19 Conclusions10 pointsCorrectly describes all of the authors
conclusions.10 points ?Correctly describes most of the authors
conclusions.9 points ?Correctly describes some of the authors
conclusions, but may
omit one or two.8 points ?Minimally describes the authors conclusions, or
misidentifies them.4 points ?Does not describe any author conclusions.0 points ?Question 20 Advances knowledge10 pointsDescribes in-depth how this research advances
knowledge in the field.10 points ?Generally, describes how this research advances
knowledge9 points ?Briefly describes how this research advances
knowledge in the field.8 points ?Incorrectlydescribes how this research advances knowledge in
the field.4 points ?Does not describe how the research advances
knowledge in the field.0 points ?Style and Writing25 pointsCorrectly names file, includes name on paper. Writes
in complete sentences with no grammar, spelling, or syntax errors.25 points ?One to four errors in grammar, spelling,22 points ?Five to eight errors in grammar, spelling, and
syntax20 points ?Eight to twelve errors in grammar, spelling, and
syntax.10 points ?Thirteen or more errors in grammar, spelling, and
syntax.0 points ?Total
Points Possible = 225 pointsReading Research Literature Week 5Type your answers to the following
questions using complete sentences and correct grammar, spelling, and syntax. Click
Save as and save the file with your last name and assignment, e.g.,NR439_Reading_Research_Literature_Smith.Submit
to the Dropbox by11:59 pm MT Sunday at the end of Week
5. The
guidelines and grading rubric for this assignment may be
found in Course Resources.Title: RRLName:[replace this text with your name]The following questions pertain to:Fu, M., Hu, J., & Cai, X. (2015).
Effectiveness of a community-based diabetes self-management intervention for
Chinese adults with type 2 diabetes: A pilot study. International Journal of
Nursing Practice, 21132-140 9p. doi:10.1111/ijn.12373.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=109809079&site=eds-live”>http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=109809079&site=eds-live1) What is the purpose of this research?2) What is the research question (or
questions)? This may be implicit or explicit.3) Give a complete description of theresearch
design of this study.4) Describe the population (sample) for
this study.5)
Was
the sample adequate for the research design that was selected and explain why.6)
Describe
the data collection procedure.7)
How
were the data analyzed after collection?8)
Discuss
the limitations found in the study.9)
Discuss
the authors’ conclusions. Do you feel these conclusions are based on the data
that they collected?10) How does this advance knowledge in the field?The
following questions pertain to:Pals, R. S., Hansen, U. M., Johansen,
C. B., Hansen, C. S., Jrgensen, M. E., Fleischer, J., & Willaing, I.
(2015). Making sense of a new technology in clinical practice: a qualitative
study of patient and physician perspectives. BMC Health Services Research,
15(1), 1-10. doi:10.1186/s12913-015-1071-1.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=her&AN=109884152&site=eds-live”>http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=her&AN=109884152&site=eds-live11) What is the purpose of this research?12) What is the research question (or
questions)? This may be implicit or explicit.13) Give a complete description of the
research design of this study.14) Describe the population (sample) for
this study.15) Was the sample adequate for the research
design that was selected and explain why.16) Describe the data collection procedure.17) How were the data analyzed?18) Discuss the limitations found in the
study?19) Discuss the authors’ conclusions. Do
you feel these conclusions are based on the data that they collected?20) How does this advance knowledge in the field.

PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH NURSING ACADEMIA PAPERS TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT